Bitcoin advocate claims Vitalik Buterin does not understand PoW

2 years ago

Swan Bitcoin laminitis Brandon Quittem said that Ethereum (ETH) co-founder Vitalik Buterin does not “deeply” recognize the Proof-of-Work (PoW) statement mechanism.

1/ I said "Vitalik ne'er understood PoW deeply"

I don't cognize if I'm close oregon wrong, but present are immoderate examples of @VitalikButerin misunderstanding PoW

🧵👇 https://t.co/Uo1oZolpVU

— Brandon Quittem (@Bquittem) August 15, 2022

In an August 15 Twitter thread, Quittem cited instances helium believes beryllium Buterin’s deficiency of knowing of the mechanism.

Centralization and censorship risks

The archetypal Buterin assertion questioned by Quittem is astir exchanges staking their customers’ deposits and the content that “PoW tin get captured by large mining.”

3/ V gets a batch incorrect with this one…

A) V doesn't deliberation exchanges volition involvement lawsuit deposits. (lol however could helium perchance miss this?)

B) "PoW tin get captured by large mining cos"

Cheap vigor is geo-distributed, often successful tiny packages. Favors a abdominous process of smaller miners. pic.twitter.com/bC9GKUoL9y

— Brandon Quittem (@Bquittem) August 15, 2022

Quittem pointed retired that 11 regulated providers already power 67% of Ethereum staking, showing that it is astatine the hazard of centralization and authorities sanctions.

Quittem continued that Buterin’s logic that exchanges volition not involvement their customers’ holdings without their consent is wrong.

The Bitcoin (BTC) advocator said the risks highlighted by Buterin are a “major crushed to outsource staking. Incentivizes exchanges/providers to gobble up supply.”

10/ “lots of PoS chains person been moving successfully” –@VitalikButerin

I conjecture if you don’t attraction astir censorship resistance… past definite spell up with PoS.

Otherwise, spell look astatine BSC, Solona, Tron, Stream, and Peercoin. I presume Ethereans don’t privation to spell that direction? pic.twitter.com/dKNaYsiEqp

— Brandon Quittem (@Bquittem) August 15, 2022

According to Quittem, Ethereum is astatine the hazard of “censorship,” citing different blockchain networks similar Solana (SOL), Tron (TRX), and Binance Smart Chain (BSC).

The crypto assemblage has identified this censorship hazard successful airy of the caller US authorisation connected Tornado Cash.

Meanwhile, Coinbase has said it would alternatively unopen down its staking services than comply with regulators’ requests to censor transactions.

Barrier of entry

Buterin had antecedently argued that the obstruction of introduction is little for proof-of-stake (PoS) than PoW. According to Buterin, 32 ETH costs overmuch little than gathering an ASIC mining firm.

8.1/ @VitalikButerin argues barriers to entry…

PoS: 32 ETH costs $60k today, astir cannot spend that. So they delegate which is simply a centralization risk.

PoW: Home BTC miners tin bargain an S9 for $200 and commencement today. (profitability varies widely) pic.twitter.com/k3CMtVBSfO

— Brandon Quittem (@Bquittem) August 15, 2022

However, Quittem counters this presumption saying location Bitcoin miners tin get an S9 mining instrumentality for arsenic debased arsenic $200 portion staking connected Ethereum costs 32 ETH (roughly $60,000).

Additionally, helium questioned Vitalik’s statement astir ASIC manufacturers being a monopoly and the outgo of mining equipment. In his view, the hazard keeps reducing since ASIC mining instrumentality is becoming much commoditized, and shaper monopoly is reducing.

4/ V argues “ASIC manufacturers are a monopoly"

This hazard is existent for Bitcoin, but little truthful each time arsenic ASICs are becoming commoditized, reducing shaper bottleneck.

(~stock to travel of ASICS is expanding implicit time)

Larger contented present successful PoS arsenic @nic__carter constituent out. pic.twitter.com/FAa91J6XXT

— Brandon Quittem (@Bquittem) August 15, 2022

 

Buterin says PoW mining breaks down nether restrictive government

Buterin claimed that PoW breaks down much rapidly nether much restrictive authorities conditions portion staking is easier to hide.

6/ "Physical PoW easier to onslaught than integer PoS"

PoW: Attack requires planetary coordination successful a multi-polar world. Expensive attack, casual to fail.

PoS: Eth involvement is walking into the financialization trap conscionable similar gold. Cheap attack, hard to stop.

h/t @kendallweihe pic.twitter.com/9z7WvAcQvv

— Brandon Quittem (@Bquittem) August 15, 2022

But Quittem does not spot it that way, highlighting a tweet from Kendall Weihe that says PoW tin lone beryllium co-opted done authorities unit portion PoS is susceptible to authorities funds.

Quittem continued that an onslaught connected PoW would necessitate planetary coordination, which makes it expensive, and tin neglect easily. On the different hand, “Eth involvement is walking into the financialization trap conscionable similar gold. Cheap attack, hard to stop.”

7/ Vitalik says separation of powers are the aforesaid successful PoW and PoS

Major contented here…

PoS: economical powerfulness = governmental power. No longer neutral, it's governmental money. caller brag 🤝 aged boss.

PoW: separates economical powerfulness from governmental power. Enables neutral commodity wealth pic.twitter.com/eoXWpjE5fn

— Brandon Quittem (@Bquittem) August 15, 2022

Quittem besides disagreed with Vitalik assertion that PoS and PoW person the aforesaid separation of powers. Instead, helium believed that successful PoS, economical powerfulness equals governmental powerfulness but PoW separates the two.

Quittem says PoW is the innovation

Quittem discredited respective different claims by the Ethereum co-founder and called PoW the innovation alternatively than PoS.

12/ Reminder that PoW is the innovation here.

PoW enables a non-political money.

ETH abandoning what works (PoW) seems precise risky.

Too precocious present though. Social statement successful ETH onshore is PoW is bad.

How galore verified this claim? How galore trusted Vitalik due to the fact that he’s smart?

— Brandon Quittem (@Bquittem) August 15, 2022

According to him, ETH switching to PoS is rather risky but is already excessively precocious now, and PoS volition apt springiness the authorities power of blockchain space.

The station Bitcoin advocator claims Vitalik Buterin does not recognize PoW appeared archetypal connected CryptoSlate.

View source