Sidechains Can Provide ‘Scalability and Flexibility Needed for Real-World Applications’ — Horizen Labs CEO

1 year ago
Sidechains Can Provide 'Scalability and Flexibility Needed for Real-World Applications' — Horizen Labs CEO

All-in-one infrastructure solutions whitethorn beryllium what is needed to thrust the adoption of Web3, but specified solutions mightiness crook retired to beryllium analyzable and not arsenic flexible, Rob Viglione, the co-founder and CEO astatine Horizen Labs, has argued. In addition, Viglione believes that specified broad infrastructure solutions “may not beryllium arsenic compatible with tools that beryllium extracurricular of the services tech stack.”

Making Infrastructure Solutions ‘More Interoperable and Composable’

Furthermore, all-in-one infrastructure solutions are apt to marque it hard for developers to accommodate their applications to caller programming standards, the CEO of the blockchain solutions radical added. Meanwhile, erstwhile asked wherefore sidechains are needed, Viglione pointed to their quality to grow the functionality of existing blockchains “requiring important modifications to their halfway codebase.”

In written answers sent to Bitcoin.com News, the co-founder besides argued that sidechains tin play a captious relation successful Web3 by “providing the scalability and flexibility needed for real-world applications.” With respect to ways that the alleged Web3 backbone tin beryllium strengthened, Viglione said this tin beryllium done by making infrastructure solutions similar blockchain bundle improvement kits (SDKs), wallet SDKs and dapp improvement instrumentality kits “more interoperable and composable.”

In the remainder of his answers to questions sent to him via Telegram, Viglione besides offered thoughts astir the aboriginal of exertion oregon enterprise-specific customized chains.

Bitcoin.com News (BCN): When looking astatine the existing Web3 infrastructure, 1 tin spot that it is dominated by specialized players successful assorted areas — specified arsenic node providers, indexers, SDKs, and wallets. Do you deliberation all-in-one infrastructure could amended the developer acquisition to accelerate Web3 adoption?

Rob Viglione (RV): A cardinal determinant for the adoption of Web3 is easiness of use. Developers indispensable beryllium capable to physique and standard blockchains and dapps, and users indispensable beryllium capable to interact with them with minimal friction. Infrastructure providers similar Ankr, Thirdweb, and others assistance trim the obstruction to introduction for developers looking to motorboat caller projects. All-in-one infrastructure providers let developers to make tools much easy and quickly, shortening the clip required to spell to marketplace and trial retired ideas.

An all-in-one infrastructure could payment developers by eliminating immoderate compatibility issues betwixt wallets, astute contracts and nodes arsenic each components would beryllium offered arsenic a azygous packaged service.

While these companies connection plentifulness of supporting tools for developers launching web3 applications, it remains to beryllium seen however good each instrumentality performs comparative to competitors that are focused wholly connected 1 benignant of infrastructure.

BCN: What would beryllium the downside, if any, for developers and enterprises relying connected an all-in-one infrastructure solution?

RV: The main drawbacks of all-in-one infrastructure solutions are complexity and deficiency of flexibility. Developers volition request to contend with UX/UI designs that whitethorn beryllium suboptimal for their applications, portion customization whitethorn beryllium costly oregon constricted owed to standardized setups. Furthermore, broad infrastructure solutions whitethorn not beryllium arsenic compatible with tools that beryllium extracurricular of the services tech stack. This could marque it hard for developers to accommodate their applications to caller programming standards.

BCN: With the epoch of multi-chain Web3 present seemingly upon us, what bash you deliberation are immoderate of the challenges to ensuring amended cross-chain privateness and security?

RV: Challenges see mediocre astute declaration auditing practices that pb to span hacks, and the nascent implementation of zero-knowledge proofs to guarantee privacy. Maintaining cross-chain information requires robust and cosmopolitan auditing practices, which is hard to execute successful an manufacture wherever caller programming standards and cryptography methods are perpetually being implemented crossed antithetic blockchains.

When these blockchains go connected via a bridge, determination is often precise constricted connection betwixt them beyond authenticating the beingness of assets connected either broadside of the bridge. Upgrades to antithetic areas of the protocol could person an interaction connected the span declaration and exposure caller vulnerabilities if not cautiously monitored.

BCN: In the past fewer years, sidechains are said to person go indispensable for helping pre-existing blockchains get the capabilities they lacked. Can you archer our readers the cardinal worth proposition of sidechains and their relation successful taking Web3 mainstream?

RV: The cardinal worth proposition of sidechains lies successful their quality to grow the functionality of existing blockchains without overloading them oregon requiring important modifications to their halfway codebase. Sidechains are fundamentally autarkic blockchains that are interoperable with the main blockchain and let for the transportation of assets betwixt chains.

This interoperability allows for a web of blockchains to run arsenic a azygous blockchain, thereby addressing issues of scalability and interoperability. For example, Horizen EON is an EVM-compatible sidechain launching connected the Horizen blockchain, which volition bring astute declaration functionality to Horizen.

Sidechains tin beryllium optimized for circumstantial traits similar speed, security, privacy, and decentralization, and tin beryllium made backstage and permissioned oregon nationalist and permissionless. This flexibility allows developers to physique applications that are tailored to circumstantial usage cases, without being constrained by the characteristics of the main blockchain.

In presumption of taking Web3 mainstream, sidechains tin play a important relation by providing the scalability and flexibility needed for real-world applications. They let developers to physique connected apical of existing projects without needing to execute statement for protocol changes, which tin beryllium a cumbersome process. This gives developers much state portion maintaining the advantages of the main blockchain.

BCN: Your institution Horizen is said to person precocious introduced the EVM-compatible EON sidechain. What does EON mean for developers and users?

RV: Horizen’s EON is simply a nationalist proof-of-stake sidechain and a afloat EVM-compatible astute contracting platform. It takes Horizen’s absorption connected interoperability to a caller level. For developers, this means they tin easy physique and deploy decentralized applications (dapps) wrong the security-focused Horizen ecosystem portion besides taking vantage of the programmability afforded by the Ethereum standard. This compatibility with Ethereum’s Virtual Machine (EVM) allows developers to leverage the existing tools, infrastructure, and assemblage of Ethereum, which tin importantly trim improvement clip and costs.

For users, EON offers the imaginable for much decentralized applications to beryllium built connected the Horizen platform. These could see decentralized concern (defi) applications, games, NFT marketplaces, loyalty programs, voting systems, and more.

Moreover, Horizen’s sidechain deployment protocol, Zendoo, allows developers to deploy their ain autarkic blockchain similar Horizen EON to conscionable their circumstantial needs. This provides developers with greater power and flexibility implicit the speed, security, and decentralization of their blockchain.

BCN: While users whitethorn not interact with the underlying infrastructure, there’s nary denying that infrastructure solutions signifier the backbone of Web3. What, successful your opinion, inactive needs to beryllium done to fortify this backbone?

RV: Infrastructure solutions similar blockchain SDKs, wallet SDKs and dapp improvement instrumentality kits request to go much interoperable and composable successful bid to fortify the backbone of Web3. Given the competitiveness of the web3 market, there’s often small information for these projects to found communal standards oregon enactment unneurotic successful a mode that decreases difficulties for extremity users operating on-chain. As a result, we’ve seen fragmented liquidity, suboptimal idiosyncratic interfaces and information vulnerabilities arsenic developers person tried to execute interoperability betwixt systems.

BCN: What are your thoughts connected the aboriginal of the exertion oregon enterprise-specific customized chains?

RV: We spot a agleam aboriginal for app-specific chains (app chains). It’s wide that antithetic usage cases prioritize antithetic blockchain features. A game, for instance, mightiness worth throughput much than decentralization; a fiscal application, meanwhile, mightiness sacrifice immoderate velocity for higher security. A level similar Horizen enables this flexibility by offering a mode for developers to rotation up sidechains optimized for circumstantial types of applications and offering interoperability betwixt those blockchains, the Horizen mainchain, and adjacent different blockchain ecosystems. The aboriginal volition not beryllium “one size fits all;” instead, flexibility and interoperability volition beryllium defining features.

What are your thoughts connected this story? Let america cognize what you deliberation successful the comments conception below.

View source