SEC flags Bitcoin miner hosting services as subject to securities laws

1 hour ago

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has flagged successful a suit that third-party Bitcoin mining hosting services tin beryllium a securities offering, a presumption powerfully opposed by 1 manufacture executive.

The SEC sued the Bitcoin (BTC) mining institution VBit and its founder, Danh Vo, successful a Delaware national tribunal connected Wednesday, accusing them of fraud and misappropriating astir $48 cardinal successful capitalist funds betwixt 2018 and 2022 by selling a greater fig of hosting agreements than determination were mining rigs.

“VBit’s Hosting Agreements are concern contracts and truthful securities,” the SEC claimed, arguing that VBit’s concern contracts conscionable the criteria of the securities-defining Howey test.

Fraud, Security, SEC, Bitcoin Mining, HashrateA highlighted excerpt of the SEC’s suit claiming VBit’s hosting agreements are securities. Source: SEC

“Investors who purchased Hosting Agreements did truthful with the anticipation of earning passive income and relied exclusively connected VBit’s efforts to gain a nett arsenic the investors did not possess, control, oregon person bureau implicit the mining rigs they purportedly purchased,” the bureau claimed.

The SEC’s assertion is simply a uncommon hangover from however the bureau approached enforcement nether the Biden administration, which crypto backers person said lumped astir cryptocurrencies and businesses nether securities laws.

VBit didn’t travel manufacture standards, SEC alleges

The SEC claimed that Vo’s Bitcoin mining hosting cognition fell acold abbreviated of modular manufacture practices, with investors incapable to way their rigs, and the institution retaining afloat operational control.

VBit besides directed hashrate into a mining excavation nether its control, which appeared to beryllium a defining origin successful the SEC’s classification of VBit’s hosted Bitcoin mining statement arsenic a security. 

In the filing, the SEC said: “The fortunes of each capitalist were purportedly tied to the fortunes of different investors due to the fact that each investor’s accidental of earning a nett was tied straight to the show of the greater VBit mining pool, and the much investors recruited into the mining pool, the greater the chances of earning much Bitcoins.”

SEC’s presumption shouldn’t interaction hosted Bitcoin mining industry

Mitchell Askew, the caput of Blockware Intelligence, told Cointelegraph that pooling hashrate isn’t manufacture signifier for hosted Bitcoin mining work providers.

Related: Bitcoin miners participate ‘harshest borderline situation of each time’

“Hosted Bitcoin mining simply means a lawsuit purchases a machine and electricity,” helium said. “There’s nary pooling of capital, nary profit-sharing, and nary reliance connected a promoter to make returns. Under the Howey test, that is precise intelligibly not a security.”

“I don’t deliberation this affects the hosted mining manufacture astatine all. Legitimate hosted mining has nary resemblance to an concern contract, and this mentation has nary legs to basal on.”

The SEC did not instantly respond to a petition for comment.

The SEC’s view that hosted Bitcoin mining tin represent a information is 1 of the astir notable classifications nether the Trump administration, which has positioned the SEC to beryllium much supportive of the industry.

Several high-profile crypto investigations that the bureau started nether the Biden medication person since been dropped, however, galore fraud-related lawsuits are ongoing.

Magazine: Big questions: Would Bitcoin past a 10-year powerfulness outage?

View source