1 year ago
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and disgraced FTX laminitis Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) are presently entangled successful a ineligible tussle implicit their respective witnesses’ list, according to Sept. 11 tribunal filings.
CryptoSlate antecedently reported that the DOJ and SBF had moved to disqualify each the adept witnesses called upon by each party, citing assorted reasons, including misleading acquisition and insufficient disclosure filings.
Both parties, however, person filed caller defenses connected wherefore the Court should o.k. their witnesses.
SBF defends witnesses
According to SBF lawyers, the government’s opposition to their client’s adept witnesser database is overreaching due to the fact that nary of their projected grounds would beryllium prejudicial oregon usurp the functions of the Court oregon the jury.
The lawyers argued that the motions were further attempts by the authorities to thwart SBF’s cardinal close to contiguous a defence oregon adjacent to present grounds that mightiness beryllium inconsistent with their theories.
They added that the authorities was “seeing ghosts” arsenic nary of the witnesses would supply “improper sentiment regarding Mr. Bankman-Fried’s cognition of important facts oregon his intent with respect to the crimes with which helium is charged.”
SBF’s witnesser database includes a lawyer, a instrumentality professor, a information analytics expert, a fiscal expert, and consultants. They would supply witnesser grounds connected FTX operations and the firm’s infrastructure.
The authorities says its adept grounds is ‘necessary and appropriate.’
In its filing, the U.S. authorities argued that the grounds of its sole witness, Professor Peter Easton, would play a important relation successful helping the assemblage see the fiscal grounds successful the case.
Part of the filing reads:
“Professor Peter Easton volition assistance the assemblage recognize Alameda Research’s important antagonistic balances connected FTX.com, the commingling and usage of FTX lawsuit funds, and the resulting deficits successful FTX and Alameda Research slope accounts and cryptocurrency wallets.”
The U.S. authorities added that Professor Easton had drawn his grounds from analyzing dozens of slope accounts, information from FTX’s transaction database, information from Alameda Research’s lenders, cryptocurrency pricing data, and blockchain records.
According to the government, SBF’s determination to cull this grounds is based connected a misreading and inconsistent with the law.
The station SBF, US justness section wrangle implicit adept witnesser credibility appeared archetypal connected CryptoSlate.
English (US) 