
Sam Bankman-Fried’s high-powered ineligible squad is pushing for the FTX founder’s impermanent merchandise from jailhouse up of his October proceedings connected fraud charges. In a question filed Thursday, lawyers Mark Cohen and Christian Everdell assertion Bankman-Fried’s Sixth Amendment rights are being violated by inadequate entree to find documents needed to assistance hole his defence against allegations helium misled investors and misused FTX lawsuit funds.
Letter Claims FTX Founder’s Rights Breached: Lawyers Demand Expanded Trial Prep Access
The lawyers argue Bankman-Fried needs “constant access” to an internet-connected laptop truthful helium tin reappraisal millions of pages of documents, behaviour online probe for context, draught investigation of evidence, and stock accusation with his ineligible team.
Under the existent program allowing Bankman-Fried conscionable 12 hours per week astatine a courthouse machine with nary internet, the lawyers accidental helium is deprived of the 80-100 hours helium spent prepping pre-jail.
They besides entity to the authorities dumping 4 cardinal much pages of find documents connected them this week, calling it “fundamentally unfair” truthful adjacent to the October proceedings start. The lawyers privation Bankman-Fried temporarily released, oregon astatine minimum granted expanded machine entree astatine jail, truthful helium tin adequately assistance physique his defense.
Bankman-Fried’s lawyers state:
Even if Mr. Bankman-Fried were retired connected bail and had unlimited clip to reappraisal these documents, it would apt beryllium intolerable for him to decorativeness reviewing them by the clip of trial. This is yet different illustration of the authorities dumping a immense measurement of find connected the defence months aft the find deadlines that the authorities represented to the court.
Judge Lewis Kaplan, who revoked Bankman-Fried’s $250 cardinal bail past month, had antecedently indicated the laminitis would person wide jailhouse entree for proceedings prep. But Bankman-Fried’s lawyers accidental what’s been provided truthful acold is inadequate compared to his erstwhile prep portion retired connected bail.
“The government’s solution, specified arsenic it is, is unacceptable and violates Mr. Bankman-Fried’s Sixth Amendment rights,” Everdell’s missive opines. “Nor does it fulfill the Court’s anticipation that Mr. Bankman-Fried would person ‘very liberal’ entree to find ‘nine, ten, eleven, 12 hours a day,’” the lawyer concluded.
What bash you deliberation astir Bankman-Fried’s question to get impermanent merchandise up of his upcoming proceedings successful October? Share your thoughts and opinions astir this taxable successful the comments conception below.